When first introduced to our photography based project, we did some exploration of the factors that make up a photograph. Lighting, composition and framing are vital to the creation of a message within a photograph. We learnt that everything done in a photo is done for a specific purpose and to give the audience a particular message.
First we looked at Andreas Gursky and his photograph of what appear to be a block of flats.
We talked about how the dark lighting overhead was natural and a sky, how it could be some form of pathetic fallacy and represent dullness. Gursky could’ve chosen to shoot the photo when the sky was light and the sun was shining but he chose this particular weather. We talked about hoe the photo is very geometric and that there are a lot of lines and boxes, how the industrial effect this creates can be contrasted with natural essence of the trees. The trees at the bottom break up the boxes and make them appear less harsh. Gurksy also chose to capture a large amount of the building, perhaps wanting to portray this idea of a large city and a constant industry of people working. Each box is the home of a person and yet they all come together to create one photograph, perhaps a metaphor for a working city with all it’s people.
Next we took a look at Thomas Demand’s work.
The only lighting appears to be very dim suggesting poorness and darkness as it is set in a domestic place. The only light is coming from the top right, suggesting a spotlight from the oven. We were then told that this photo was an exact copy of Saddam Hussein’s hideout, taken from a newspaper. I was interested to find this out because without knowing the subject of the photo, I assumed it was set in a slum or a poor household due to the mess of the picture and the dim colour of the floors and walls compared to brightness of the mismatched plates and cutlery.
Finally we looked at Phillip DeCorcia.
Instantly you notice that the lighting is coming from the top left, illuminating the man in the background. The focus appears to be on him. He’s wearing a suit, suggesting power an authority whilst the man in the front is in casual wear and a hat. There is a contrast between the two men reflected in the way they arte standing. The pose suggests the man in the back has power, perhaps giving him authority over the man in front.
Decoding the message of a photograph is not always a simple task and it takes some exploration to sometimes understand the true nature of a piece of work. On occasions the public might not understand a particular set of photos but on rarities, the photographer sometimes might not want them to in order to create a sense of mystery We see photos and we build our own truths to fit the concept. It’s human nature to want to fill in the blanks.